Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Always Active

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Always Active

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Always Active

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Always Active

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Time limit prescribed under 29A applicable to arbitrations invoked post-2015 Amendment 

Posted On - 5 September, 2024 • By - KM Team

In 2015, Section 29A was inserted to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) by way of an amendment (2015 Amendment). It was again amended in 2019 (2019 Amendment). Section 29A of the Act prescribes timelines to pass an arbitral award i.e., within 12 months from the date of completion of pleadings with an additional grace period of 6 months, if the parties mutually agree. However, once the 18 months’ period is over, either of the parties may approach the competent court to extend the time period for passing the arbitral award. 

Recently, the Delhi High Court in M/S Chinar Steel Industries v. Ircon International Limited had the opportunity to consider if the time limit prescribed under Section 29A of the Act applies to arbitrations that commenced even before the 2015 Amendment but the arbitral tribunal “entered reference” only after the 2015 Amendment.   

While the 2015 Amendment provided that the arbitral award shall be passed within 12 months from the time the arbitral tribunal “entered reference”, the same was removed by the 2019 Amendment. Accordingly, the Delhi High Court observed that the date of “commencement” of arbitration is the yardstick to determine the applicability of Section 29A of the Act and not the time when arbitral tribunal “entered reference”. Accordingly, in the present case, the date when the arbitral tribunal “entered reference” becomes irrelevant. The Delhi High Court observed that although the arbitral tribunal was constituted i.e., “entered reference” after the 2015 Amendment, the arbitration was invoked prior to the 2015 Amendment. Therefore, the time limit prescribed under Section 29A of the Act will not apply to the present matter or to any matter that commenced prior to the 2015 Amendment.  

The information contained in this document is not legal advice or legal opinion. The contents recorded in the said document are for informational purposes only and should not be used for commercial purposes. Acuity Law LLP disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident, or any other cause. 

Related

Dispute ResolutionDelhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd