Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Always Active

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Always Active

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Always Active

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Always Active

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Delhi High Court: Directors cannot be made parties to the arbitration proceedings against the company through the group of companies doctrine

Posted On - 12 February, 2024 • By - KM Team

The Delhi High Court in its recent decision of Vingro Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Nitya Shree Developers Pvt. Ltd. held that the directors of a company cannot be made parties to the arbitration proceedings against the company under the group of companies doctrine.  

While distinguishing the facts of the matter from the recent Supreme Court ruling of Cox & Kings v. SAP India, the Ld. Single Judge held that merely because a director signs a contract on behalf of the company, it does not confer ‘common intention’ to bind the said director as a signatory. The Ld. Single judge referred to the provisions of agency under the Indian Contract Act which specifically denote that an agent of a disclosed principal cannot be made liable for the acts of its principal to hold that the group of companies doctrine cannot be applied in the sad situation.  

Authors: Renjith Nair 

The information contained in this document is not legal advice or legal opinion. The contents recorded in the said document are for informational purposes only and should not be used for commercial purposes. Acuity Law LLP disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident, or any other cause. 

 

Related

Dispute ResolutionDelhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd